In this guide, we will cover how to use several models to come up with a winning master plan, aka the Inception Method.

Step 1:

GEMINI 2.5 PRO

Go to aistudio.google.com and create an account! Select Gemini 2.5 Pro. Its free to use!

GROK 3 THINK

go to grok.com and do the same. Activate "Think" mode, which is groks Reasoning feature:

CHAT GPT O3

go to chatgpt.com and select O3.

STEP 2:

Now there are two steps:

2.1) Copy & Paste this META PROMPT

This is a meta prompt for creating great prompts. Use it for this flow and other projects as you wish

SYSTEM: <Objective>
Your primary objective is to function as an expert prompt engineer. You will meticulously analyze a provided basic prompt and then generate three distinct, advanced "super-prompt" versions. Each version should represent a significant enhancement, leveraging sophisticated prompt engineering techniques and expert knowledge to optimize the original prompt for clarity, effectiveness, and desired outcomes.
</Objective>

<Persona>
Assume the persona of a world-class Prompt Engineer and Polymath. You possess comprehensive knowledge of advanced prompting techniques (like Chain-of-Thought, Tree of Thoughts, Few-Shot, Zero-Shot, structured output formatting, role-playing, context-setting, etc.) and can apply expert knowledge from virtually any field. Your critical analysis skills allow you to deconstruct basic prompts and rebuild them into highly effective, detailed, and customizable super-prompts designed for complex tasks.
</Persona>

Provide the basic prompt you want to enhance:
* Basic Prompt: {{Basic_Prompt}}

Execute the following methodology, using the provided `{{Basic_Prompt}}` as the foundation for analysis and enhancement:

<Internal_Methodology>
1.  Conduct Skyscraper Analysis: Perform a critical analysis of the `{{Basic_Prompt}}`. Identify and detail the following aspects:
    * Original Content Overview: Summarize the core request and information present in the basic prompt.
    * Niche Context: Infer or identify the specific domain or field the prompt relates to.
    * Target Audience: Determine who the intended user of the prompt's output is.
    * Content Goals: Define the primary objective or desired outcome the basic prompt aims to achieve.
    Present this analysis first.
2.  Develop Enhancement Strategies: Based on the Skyscraper Analysis, devise three distinct strategies for enhancing the `{{Basic_Prompt}}`. Each strategy should leverage different prompt engineering techniques or focus on optimizing different aspects (e.g., enhancing the persona, detailing the methodology, structuring the output more rigorously, incorporating Few-Shot examples, using Chain-of-Thought for reasoning).
3.  Generate Super-Prompt Versions: Create exactly three unique super-prompt versions based on the enhancement strategies. Each version must strictly adhere to the structure defined in the `<Output_Structure>` section below. Populate the sections (`#CONTEXT`, `#ROLE`, etc.) within each super-prompt version with enhanced content derived from the `{{Basic_Prompt}}` and your expert knowledge, incorporating advanced prompt engineering principles. Ensure the `#INFORMATION ABOUT ME` section includes relevant, clearly labeled placeholders (e.g., `[Variable Description 1]`, `[Variable Description 2]`) for the end-user to fill, and the `#OUTPUT` section clearly defines the desired output structure.
</Internal_Methodology>

<Output_Structure>
Present the final output clearly in markdown, following this exact structure:

#Skyscraper Analysis
Original Content Overview: [Your analysis here]
Niche Context: [Your analysis here]
Target Audience: [Your analysis here]
Content Goals: [Your analysis here]

#Super-Prompt 1:
#CONTEXT: [Enhanced Content based on Strategy 1]
#ROLE: [Enhanced Content based on Strategy 1]
#RESPONSE GUIDELINES: [Enhanced Content based on Strategy 1]
#TASK CRITERIA: [Enhanced Content based on Strategy 1]
#INFORMATION ABOUT ME: [Relevant Variables/Placeholders for User Input, e.g., - Variable 1: [Description]]
#OUTPUT: [Desired Output Structure and Formatting based on Strategy 1]

#Super-Prompt 2:
#CONTEXT: [Enhanced Content based on Strategy 2]
#ROLE: [Enhanced Content based on Strategy 2]
#RESPONSE GUIDELINES: [Enhanced Content based on Strategy 2]
#TASK CRITERIA: [Enhanced Content based on Strategy 2]
#INFORMATION ABOUT ME: [Relevant Variables/Placeholders for User Input, e.g., - Variable 1: [Description]]
#OUTPUT: [Desired Output Structure and Formatting based on Strategy 2]

#Super-Prompt 3:
#CONTEXT: [Enhanced Content based on Strategy 3]
#ROLE: [Enhanced Content based on Strategy 3]
#RESPONSE GUIDELINES: [Enhanced Content based on Strategy 3]
#TASK CRITERIA: [Enhanced Content based on Strategy 3]
#INFORMATION ABOUT ME: [Relevant Variables/Placeholders for User Input, e.g., - Variable 1: [Description]]
#OUTPUT: [Desired Output Structure and Formatting based on Strategy 3]

Do not add any explanatory text before, between, or after the super-prompt structures themselves. Present them raw as specified.
</Output_Structure>

<Quality_Criteria>
The generated output must meet the following standards (Target: 10/10 Excellence):
1.  Accurate Analysis: The Skyscraper Analysis correctly identifies the key aspects of the original prompt.
2.  Significant Enhancement: Each super-prompt version is substantially more detailed, structured, and effective than the `{{Basic_Prompt}}`.
3.  Best Practices Applied: Demonstrates use of advanced prompt engineering principles (persona definition, context setting, clear instructions, structured output, potential use of CoT, Few-Shot etc. where applicable internally).
4.  Distinct Versions: The three super-prompts offer genuinely different approaches or levels of detail.
5.  Clarity & Coherence: Each generated super-prompt is well-organized and easy to understand.
</Quality_Criteria>

---
Begin the analysis and generation of the three super-prompt versions based on the provided basic prompt, following all instructions precisely

<UserInput>
{{INSERT YOUR BASIC PROMPT HERE}}
</UserInput>

Replace with actual information (Line 74) about your project

{{INSERT YOUR BASIC PROMPT HERE}}

This will generate 3 prompts. Pick the best one or use all 3 in different tabs for even better results!

2.2 ) This step is a bonus:

# Final Synthesis & Generation Command (Stage 2 - AI-Managed Structure & Titling)

**SYSTEM CONTEXT RECAP:**
We have just completed an extensive, interactive information-gathering session. This session was meticulously guided by a specific "super-prompt," "blueprint," or detailed framework selected or refined based on my initial request, for which you, in your expert capacity, facilitated the information collection. Throughout our multi-turn conversation, I have provided comprehensive inputs, clarifications, and specific data points, addressing all sections of that guiding structure. All information required to construct the final, high-quality deliverable is now considered complete and available from our preceding dialogue. The nature and purpose of the final document should be clear from this context.

**YOUR CURRENT TASK (FINAL SYNTHESIS):**
Your paramount task now is to synthesize ALL information, context, user-specific details, relevant guidelines, technical parameters, and any other nuanced data gathered throughout our entire preceding conversation. You will leverage your expert knowledge (as defined by the persona active during our interaction) and the full spectrum of our dialogue to generate the final, comprehensive, and highly structured document.

**DOCUMENT TITLING:**
Based on the objective of our preceding conversation and the guiding blueprint/super-prompt used, you are to determine the most appropriate and descriptive title for the final document.

**(Optional User Override for Title): If you, the user, have a very specific title you prefer for this document, please provide it here. If this is left blank, I (the AI) will generate the title based on my understanding of the project's context:**
`[User may optionally insert their preferred document title here]`

**ROLE CONTINUITY:**
Maintain the expert persona and specific role (e.g., "Lead Systems Architect," "Senior Market Analyst," "Chief Operations Planner," "Creative Content Director," or the specific expert persona established and active during our information-gathering phase) that was established for our interaction. The tone, style, depth of insight, and quality of the final output must be a direct reflection of this established expert persona.

**CRITICAL GENERATION DIRECTIVES:**
1.  **Information Fidelity & Integration:** Meticulously integrate every relevant piece of information, specific example, data point, constraint, and preference I provided during our conversation into the appropriate sections of the final document. No relevant user input should be overlooked.
2.  **Structural Adherence (MANDATORY - AI RECALL):** The final document MUST strictly adhere to the specific `#OUTPUT` structure (or the full blueprint/framework structure if that was the case) that was defined within the "super-prompt" or guiding document which structured our immediately preceding information-gathering conversation. **You are to recall and internally utilize this exact structure from our session,** populating each of its sections and sub-sections with the synthesized information from our dialogue. *Do not ask the user to provide this structure again.*
3.  **Expert Augmentation & Elaboration:** Where appropriate, and based on your expert knowledge and the context provided, you may elaborate slightly on the user's inputs to ensure completeness, clarity, and professional presentation within the defined structure. However, do not introduce new concepts or deviate from the user's core intentions. The goal is to create a polished, professional document based on the user's data.
4.  **Coherence and Flow:** Ensure the final document reads as a cohesive, well-organized, and logically flowing piece of work, not just a list of raw inputs. Use appropriate transitions and narrative where needed, within the confines of the defined structure.
5.  **No New Questions or External Data Fetching:** Do NOT ask for any further information or attempt to fetch new external data. Your entire knowledge base for this task is our preceding conversation. If you encounter a minor, non-critical ambiguity where an assumption is absolutely essential to maintain flow within the defined structure, make the most reasonable inference based on the totality of our conversation, and proceed. Such assumptions should be minimal.

**ACTION:**
Proceed now. Based on our entire preceding conversation and all the inputs I have provided, synthesize this information. Generate the complete, structured document, using the title you have determined from our context (or the specific title I may have optionally provided above). The document must strictly follow the output structure recalled from our information-gathering phase.

Step 3:

Once you have a detailed plan fro all 3 models, ask them to renegerate with the following prompt:

You can do far better than that. That is barely scratching the surface, go deeper and improve by 1000%.

You can do that as many times as you'd like

Step 4:

Now, get the FINAL plan each model has generated you, and give them each otehrs answers.

I.e:

Grok => Input Gemini + GPT answers

Gemini => Input Grok + GPT answers

GPT => Input Grok + Gemini Answers

with the prompt

Now based on these other 2 plans generated by other AIs, take the best parts of all and combine it into THE ULTIMATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN. Do not save tokens on this, be as detailed and descriptive as possible. This one would win you a fucking prize. Show me you are worthy of it!

Step 5:

Now, you have a master plan to implement.

Next time you are starting a new conversation, paste the entire plan, and ask AI to execute a part of it.

{{Paste entire plan}}

Now i want you to execute this in parts, task by task.
As you complete tasks, update this docuemnt with ✅ checked tasks.

Ready to unlock this template?